Stakeholders at the Heart of Impact Evaluation
Selected theme: Role of Stakeholders in Impact Evaluation. Welcome to a space where communities, implementers, funders, policymakers, and researchers co-create evidence that leads to real-world change. Explore how meaningful engagement elevates rigor, equity, and usefulness—then add your voice, share your stories, and subscribe to keep the conversation alive.
Mapping the Stakeholder Landscape
Who Counts as a Stakeholder?
Stakeholders include primary beneficiaries, frontline staff, community leaders, local government, private suppliers, watchdog groups, funders, media, and subject-matter experts. Do not overlook informal influencers or marginalized voices. A careful scan surfaces risks and blind spots so evaluation decisions reflect real-world dynamics rather than assumptions. Share your categories and help us refine this community checklist.
Prioritizing Influence and Interest
Using tools like the power–interest matrix and salience criteria (power, legitimacy, urgency) helps right-size engagement. High power and high interest groups may join steering committees, while low power but high legitimacy groups need safe channels to shape questions. Comment if you use alternative prioritization models, and tell us how you adapt as power shifts over time.
A Map That Changed the Plan
In a rural water program, a simple mapping exercise revealed spare-parts vendors as crucial stakeholders. By involving them early, the team added indicators on parts availability and pricing, improving sustainability beyond installation counts. The change saved months of troubleshooting later. Have you discovered an unexpected stakeholder who transformed your evaluation?
Co-creating Evaluation Questions
Donor frameworks offer structure, but communities ground relevance. Bridging both can refine a vague target like “improve livelihoods” into specific, measurable outcomes such as reduced seasonal hunger gaps or safer migration decisions. Stakeholders help validate causal pathways and expose indicator drift. Share how you balance reporting requirements with lived realities.
Power, Equity, and Ethics in Engagement
Consider gender, caste, disability, age, language, and class. Offer anonymous channels, independent facilitation, safe transport, and accessible venues. Schedule sessions when caregivers can attend and publish ground rules that protect dissent. Equity is not a slogan—it is a set of design choices that make honest participation possible. What practices have worked for you?
Power, Equity, and Ethics in Engagement
Use plain-language consent, minimize data collection, allow opt-out without penalty, and clarify how results will be used. Align with IRB or GDPR where relevant, encrypt sensitive files, and share only what communities approve. Ethical practice builds trust and improves data quality. Tell us how you return results and honor community data rights.
Improving Data Quality Through Stakeholder Participation
01
Local Knowledge Reduces Measurement Error
Community members flag seasonal confounders, informal transport routes, and local cost drivers that skew indicators. Their insights refine recall periods, adjust sampling frames, and suggest context-specific proxies. The result is higher validity and fewer surprises at analysis time. What local insights have most improved your measures? Contribute an example from your fieldwork.
02
Citizen-Generated Data and Verification
Crowdsourcing reports via SMS or messaging apps expands coverage but requires verification. Triangulate with administrative data, random checks, or photo evidence, and document false-positive rates. Train contributors and publish feedback loops so people see how data is used. Share your protocols for quality control without discouraging participation.
03
Enumerator Co-training With Beneficiaries
A youth employment evaluation invited beneficiaries to co-train enumerators. Together they built a jargon-free glossary, piloted sensitive items, and rehearsed consent scripts. Item nonresponse dropped, and open-ended answers were richer. Have you tried co-training or co-piloting tools? Tell us what you learned and what you would change next time.
